- Back to Home »
- mobile wall papers »
- Mobile Wallpapers HD Quotes
Posted by : Unknown
Source(Google.com.pk)
WP:BIO redirects here. you will are yearning for Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:WikiProject life story, Wikipedia:WikiProject Biology or Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies.
Blue tick This page documents associate degree English Wikipedia famous person guideline. it's a usually accepted normal that editors ought to plan to follow, tho' it's best treated with logic, and occasional exceptions might apply. Any substantive edit to the present page ought to replicate accord. once doubtful, discuss initial on the speak page.
All biographies of living people should adjust to the policy on biographies of living people, being supported by spare reliable freelance sources to confirm neutrality.
Notability
This famous person guideline for biographies[2] reflects accord reached through discussions and bolstered by established follow, and informs choices on whether or not a piece a couple of person ought to be written, merged, deleted or any developed. For recommendation concerning the way to write account articles, see Wikipedia:Manual of favor (biographies) and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
The article title ought to outline what the article is concerning. If there's enough valid content to fill a piece concerning the person, then "John Doe" would be associate degree acceptable title. If, however, there's merely enough info concerning one notable event associated with the person, then the article ought to be titled specifically this event, like Steve Bartman incident. typically once a superstar dies, there's enough info for a piece concerning their death, like Death of vocaliser or Death of Diana, patrician of Wales. If a notable person's main article is simply too long to contain all of their works, then a separate page will be created for that info, like writer listing. If the person was the topic of a notable murder, then a title like Murder of Kitty city is suitable.
A person is likely to be notable if he or she has been the topic of multiple published[3] secondary sources that ar reliable, intellectually freelance of every alternative,[4] and freelance of the topic.[5]
If the depth of coverage in any given supply isn't substantial, then multiple freelance sources is also combined to demonstrate famous person; trivial coverage of an issue by secondary sources might not be spare to determine notability.[6]
Primary sources is also accustomed support content in a piece, however they are doing not contribute toward proving the famous person of an issue.
People who meet the essential criteria is also thought-about notable while not meeting the extra criteria below. Articles should still not be created for such individuals if they make up exclusionary criteria, like being notable just for one event, or like those listed in What Wikipedia isn't.
Additional criteria[edit]
People ar doubtless to be notable if they meet any of the subsequent standards. Failure to fulfill these criteria isn't conclusive proof that an issue shouldn't be included; conversely, meeting one or additional doesn't guarantee that an issue ought to be enclosed.
A person UN agency fails to fulfill these further criteria should still be notable beneath Wikipedia:Notability. Editors might realize these criteria useful once deciding whether or not to tag a piece as requiring further citations (using } for example), or to instead initiate a deletion discussion.
Any biography[edit]
Shortcut:
WP:ANYBIO
The person has received a widely known and important award or honor, or has been nominative for one many times.
The person has created a well known contribution that's a part of the enduring account in his or her specific field.[7]
Academics[edit]
Main page: Wikipedia:Notability (academics)
Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and alternative students (collectively cited as "academics" for convenience) ar notably powerful within the world of concepts while not their biographies being the topic of secondary sources.
Creative professionals[edit]
"WP:author" redirects here. For info concerning the authorship of Wikipedia articles, see WP:OWN.
Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and alternative artistic professionals:
The person is considered a very important figure or is wide cited by peers or successors.
The person is thought for originating a big new thought, theory or technique.
The person has created, or contend a serious role in co-creating, a big or well-known work, or collective body of labor, that has been the topic of associate degree freelance book or feature-length film, or of multiple freelance periodical articles or reviews.
The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a big monument, (b) has been a considerable a part of a big exhibition, (c) has won important important attention, or (d) is drawn inside the permanent collections of many notable galleries or museums.
Crime victims and perpetrators[edit]
See also: Wikipedia:Notability (events)#Criminal acts
"WP:CRIME" redirects here. For the Crime WikiProject, see WP:WikiProject Crime..
Where there's such associate degree existing article, it should be acceptable to form a sub-article, however provided that this is often necessitated by concerns of article size.
Where there aren't any acceptable existing articles, the criminal or victim in question ought to be the topic of a Wikipedia article provided that one amongst the subsequent applies:
For victims, and people wrong condemned of crime
The victim or person wrong condemned, in keeping with WP:BLP1E had an outsized role inside a well-documented historic event. The historic significance is indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote important attention to the individual's role.[8]
For perpetrators
The victim of the crime could be a famed national or international figure, including, however not restricted to, politicians or celebrities.[9]
The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been thought-about noteworthy—such that it's a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that persists on the far side contemporaneous news coverage and devotes important attention to the individual's role.[10]
Note: A living person suspect of against the law is likely innocent unless and till this is often set by a court of law. Editors should offer serious thought to not making a piece on associate degree alleged wrongdoer once no conviction is nevertheless secured.
Entertainers[edit]
Shortcuts:
WP:ENT
WP:ENTERTAINER
WP:NACTOR
WP:NMODEL
Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion manufacturers, models, and celebrities:
Has had important roles in multiple notable films, tv shows, stage performances, or alternative productions.
Has a massive fan base or a big "cult" following.
Has created distinctive, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of recreation.
See WP:MUSIC for pointers on musicians, composers, groups, etc.
Pornographic actors and models[edit]
Shortcuts:
WP:PORNBIO
WP:PORNSTAR
The following criteria ought to be spoken during a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion discussion solely in reference to subjects UN agency ar or are concerned within the erotica business.
Has won a widely known and important business award. Awards in scene-related and ensemble classes ar excluded from thought.
Has created distinctive contributions to a selected sexy genre, like starting a trend in pornography; asterisked in associate degree painting, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature; or could be a member of associate degree business Hall of Fame like the AVN Hall of Fame, XRCO Hall of Fame or equivalent.
Has been featured multiple times in notable thought media.
Military personnel[edit]
For WikiProject Military History steerage, see: Project famous person guide
Politicians[edit]
Further information: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes#Politicians
Shortcuts:
WP:POLITICIAN
WP:NPOL
Politicians and judges UN agency have control international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) workplace, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial assembly.[11] This conjointly applies to persons UN agency are nonappointive to such offices however haven't nevertheless assumed them.
Major native political figures UN agency have received important press coverage.[7]
Just being associate degree nonappointive native official, or associate degree unelected candidate for political workplace, doesn't guarantee famous person, though such individuals will still be notable if they meet the first famous person criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that ar freelance of the topic of the article".
For the needs of this guideline, ambassadorships don't seem to be thought-about international offices.
In the case of candidates for political workplace UN agency don't meet this guideline, the final rule is to airt to associate degree acceptable page covering the election or political workplace sought-after in position of deletion. Relevant material from the account article will be incorporated into the election or political workplace page if acceptable


Post a Comment